Feb232009
The Wrestler
Posted by elliott under Uncategorized
[8] Comments
The Wrestler is a true champ—in part because the screenwriter, Robert D. Siegel, and the director, Darren Aronofsky, never go for the knock-out. Instead, they’ve made a beautifully lean picture, austere enough that its moments of sentimentality drizzle like raindrops, and never cascade. This story, which tells of one man’s downfall, is so simple and focused that it might seem puny, but as the titular fighter, beefed-up Mickey Rourke brings to the film every ounce of his weight.
Rourke plays Randy “The Ram” Robinson: a middle-aged grocery clerk on weekdays, but on weekends, the elder statesman of smack-down. His salad days of the 1980s are long since passed—he was once famous enough to have been a character in an N.E.S. game—but he’s still accosted for autographs by fans who’ve grown up watching him. However, when not on the mat, he’s just scraping by: He can hardly afford the trailer he calls home, is estranged from his lesbian daughter, Stephanie (Evan Rachel Wood), and the closest he comes to intimacy is with a stripper called Cassidy (Marisa Tomei). Eventually, the physical abuse he suffers in the ring culminates in a heart attack; Randy retires, and tries to solidify his relationships with the women, but fails. When he misses a dinner date with Stephanie because of a weekend binge involving coke and a fulsome floozy, she rejects him permanently; and Cassidy—a single mother—refuses to date a customer. When she finally reconsiders, it’s too late; Randy, alone and despondent, has remounted the stage for one last fight, and given his ailing heart to the cheering crowd.
The plot isn’t entirely original, and some of Siegel’s characters are clichés coated with varnish, but his approach is open-minded. As The Wrestler is executed, Randy is neither blown up into an Arthur Miller everyman, nor deflated by a mean-spirited critique of the lumpen. The picture is human scaled, and its tough-love realism allows Rourke to reveal the grace that can lie behind brutality. His Randy is too large and beastly for his gentle spirit, but is too small intellectually to do much else other than be large and beastly. He’s trapped, but too unwieldy to rattle his cage; and, for the most part, he’s too limited—too shallow—to conceive that there is a cage. Yet it’s a trap that he’s set, and his inability to extricate himself is what makes his story tragic.
But his shallowness isn’t emptiness. Randy is good-hearted and repentant—but he’s also incompetent. Rourke is wonderful because he gives his all, but he doesn’t forsake craft; he uses his too-big body as an alienating device. Randy may be an Average Joe, but Rourke’s physique makes him look as alienated as a penguin in a coal mine. Tomei also acts with her physique. She wrests herself from hooker-with-a-heart-of-gold mediocrity by embracing the sordid in Cassidy rather than the sweet—she isn’t terribly ashamed of being a 44-year-old stripper. Her limited aspirations are part of the movie’s bleak, tragic honesty: its characters are ensnared by their own lack of imagination. The onstage enmity between the wrestlers is just as illusory as the distinction between stripper and trick, and the New Jersey setting isn’t inherently evil (oddly enough, for Jersey…): it’s only what the characters have made it to be. Their cynicism is ingrained, leaving them powerless; the ceiling above them isn’t glass—it’s concrete.
It’s because of this cynicism (which the filmmakers very delicately critique) that I imagine the film may be a tough sell for some. Aronofsky, whose previous films (such as π and Requiem for a Dream) also dealt with self-destruction, has rejected his trademark formalism for a starkly realistic approach—his exterior shots capture each miserable particle of dirt in the street-side piles of slush. His tripod-free style can be a tad overbearing (and his over-the-shoulder-shot motif a tad obvious), but it isn’t one-note; when it captures Randy and Stephanie dancing in a decrepit boardwalk ballroom, or Randy yukking it up with customers at the grocery store deli, it makes one cognizant of the simple pleasures that one takes for granted. Aronofsky’s shooting style embodies the uncondescendingly limpid tone of Siegel’s script; we see the wrestlers not as brutes or pawns or phonies, but simply as masochists-for-hire. Aronofsky’s choreography of the fight scenes isn’t virtuoso like Scorsese’s in Raging Bull, but we feel the blows acutely and viscerally because they’re free from the distancing barrier of expressionism; and because we sympathize with the combatants, whose participation is willing if misguided, our reactions become all the more intense. There’s no poetry in this violence, and no romance. Just pain lying bare.
But pain isn’t what drives us to movie theaters; for my money, S&M cults are better equipped for that. So The Wrestler offers us more than a bloody nose. Its slightness clearly has its drawbacks, such as the slipshod, fill-in-the-blanks underwriting of Stephanie’s character, and a few-too-many mawkish bits of Randy playing with kindred children. But The Wrestler’s openness is what affords it the kind of emotional complexity that movies like Milk, Slumdog Millionaire and Requiem for a Dream are too slick to attain. And that complexity allows one to drink in the movie’s deeper implications without gagging; they’re neither curdled nor shoved down our throats.
Randy’s final fight is a 20th-anniversary rematch between The Ram and a wrestler called Ayatollah: America vs. the Middle East. I’d be a ninny if I took that for a one-to-one ratio, but I’d be a fool to deny how thoughtful and well-stated Randy is as a metaphor for the United States of recent years. (I can’t claim expertise on Iran’s current self-image.) The swearing-in of Obama—or, as one professor of mine put it, the signing-off of the Reagan era—may make The Wrestler seem like a time capsule of the fatalistic period which may or may not be passing. But if one accounts for Aronofsky’s successful adoption of a new style, and the Oscar-nominated comebacks of Rourke and Tomei, then maybe our transition will not be so rough as Randy’s.
8 Responses to “ The Wrestler ”
Comments:
Leave a Reply
Trackbacks & Pingbacks:
-
Pingback from The Critic’s Criticism of His Critics » Movie Monster
July 10th, 2009 at 2:32 am[...] level of an unpretentious studio turd like The Hangover—but films such as There Will be Blood or The Wrestler or Synecdoche, New York or Tarsem’s short-lived The Fall were much more interesting than The [...]
-
Pingback from The Hurt Locker » Movie Monster
September 10th, 2009 at 12:26 pm[...] and pregnant with echoes of their grander context. It’s as if she made a war film in the style of The Wrestler. She stages combat effectively, appositely—the complexity of her images is almost subliminal. [...]
-
Pingback from Up in the Air » Movie Monster
January 3rd, 2010 at 8:31 pm[...] Up in the Air—in its assumptions—isn’t really specific to our time in the way that The Wrestler is. In a more optimistic period, Bingham may have gotten his second chance; but whether it’s a [...]
-
Pingback from Crazy Heart » Movie Monster
February 18th, 2010 at 5:33 pm[...] barfly. (Bad’s touring life is both Up in the Air in economy class and a domestication of The Wrestler.) Contrast this shot with one of Robert Duvall—as Bad’s loudmouth [...]
-
Pingback from Iron Man 2 » Movie Monster
May 13th, 2010 at 1:26 am[...] he’s downgraded from walk to waddle to match his chichi threads. I think it’s an homage to The Wrestler when Stark conks Vanko on the noggin with a folding chair; but I hope Rourke pays homage to that [...]
-
Pingback from Black Swan » Movie Monster
December 30th, 2010 at 1:01 am[...] Aronofsky’s The Wrestler was near-great. It may have been diffuse around the edges, but it had Mickey Rourke for its beating [...]
-
Pingback from The Fighter » Movie Monster
January 24th, 2011 at 1:04 am[...] Fighter is a fine piece of work—though not a work of art. It doesn’t transcend its genre, like The Wrestler did (Aronofsky is listed as an executive producer); but it hits all the familiar notes in a way [...]
-
Pingback from Cyrus » Movie Monster
April 5th, 2011 at 4:51 pm[...] pivot than person.) It’s fine, but it seems to put in a vise the tough cookie who roughed out The Wrestler, and the brassy, hoop-earringed dame who squawked triumphantly through My Cousin Vinny. All this [...]