<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Greenberg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kitschmag.com/movies/2010/04/08/greenberg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kitschmag.com/movies/2010/04/08/greenberg/</link>
	<description>Just another kitsch-ka-blogs weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:18:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Our Idiot Brother &#187; Movie Monster</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kitschmag.com/movies/2010/04/08/greenberg/comment-page-1/#comment-29182</link>
		<dc:creator>Our Idiot Brother &#187; Movie Monster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 19:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kitschmag.com/movies/2010/03/30/greenberg/#comment-29182</guid>
		<description>[...] to break the surface is a counterpoint to iddy Ned the way that laid-back L.A. was contrapuntal in Greenberg—although Greenberg erred in saying that he was in the only place where adults dressed like [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to break the surface is a counterpoint to iddy Ned the way that laid-back L.A. was contrapuntal in Greenberg—although Greenberg erred in saying that he was in the only place where adults dressed like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cedar Rapids &#187; Movie Monster</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kitschmag.com/movies/2010/04/08/greenberg/comment-page-1/#comment-14753</link>
		<dc:creator>Cedar Rapids &#187; Movie Monster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 03:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kitschmag.com/movies/2010/03/30/greenberg/#comment-14753</guid>
		<description>[...] whose suburban, subterranean dwellings—astride mom’s washing machine and the Xbox—have long since earned them the title of “slacker,” and a place in the annals of cliché. I’m generalizing, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] whose suburban, subterranean dwellings—astride mom’s washing machine and the Xbox—have long since earned them the title of “slacker,” and a place in the annals of cliché. I’m generalizing, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exit Through the Gift Shop &#187; Movie Monster</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kitschmag.com/movies/2010/04/08/greenberg/comment-page-1/#comment-1958</link>
		<dc:creator>Exit Through the Gift Shop &#187; Movie Monster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 07:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kitschmag.com/movies/2010/03/30/greenberg/#comment-1958</guid>
		<description>[...] into the mix, aren’t quite convincing; Banksy, and the narrator (Rhys Ifans, of Pirate Radio and Greenberg—an appropriate choice), just can’t play sentimental. But the change in timber between the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] into the mix, aren’t quite convincing; Banksy, and the narrator (Rhys Ifans, of Pirate Radio and Greenberg—an appropriate choice), just can’t play sentimental. But the change in timber between the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDF200</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kitschmag.com/movies/2010/04/08/greenberg/comment-page-1/#comment-1007</link>
		<dc:creator>TDF200</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kitschmag.com/movies/2010/03/30/greenberg/#comment-1007</guid>
		<description>Interesting blog, Elliott. But you&#039;ve left out a key part of the picture: Generation Jones (between the Boomers and Generation X). One way to distinguish between the generations under discussion in movies is with these three films, each with a generational ensemble cast, which came out within the same year: Big Chill (Boomers), St. Elmos&#039; Fire (Jonesers), The Breakfast Club (Xers).

Google Generation Jones, and you’ll see it’s gotten lots of media attention, and many top commentators from many top publications and networks (Washington Post, Time magazine, NBC, Newsweek, ABC, etc.) now specifically use this term. In fact, the Associated Press&#039; annual Trend Report chose the Rise of Generation Jones as the #1 trend of 2009.

It is important to distinguish between the post-WWII demographic boom in births vs. the cultural generations born during that era. Generations are a function of the common formative experiences of its members, not the fertility rates of its parents. And most analysts now see generations as getting shorter (usually 10-15 years now), partly because of the acceleration of culture. Many experts now believe it breaks down more or less this way:

DEMOGRAPHIC boom in babies:    1946-1964
Baby Boom GENERATION:            1942-1953
Generation Jones:                               1954-1965
Generation X:                                     1966-1978
Generation Y/Millennials:                  1979-1993

Here are some good links about GenJones I found:

http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20090127/column27_st.art.htm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ta_Du5K0jk

http://generationjones.com/2009latest.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting blog, Elliott. But you&#8217;ve left out a key part of the picture: Generation Jones (between the Boomers and Generation X). One way to distinguish between the generations under discussion in movies is with these three films, each with a generational ensemble cast, which came out within the same year: Big Chill (Boomers), St. Elmos&#8217; Fire (Jonesers), The Breakfast Club (Xers).</p>
<p>Google Generation Jones, and you’ll see it’s gotten lots of media attention, and many top commentators from many top publications and networks (Washington Post, Time magazine, NBC, Newsweek, ABC, etc.) now specifically use this term. In fact, the Associated Press&#8217; annual Trend Report chose the Rise of Generation Jones as the #1 trend of 2009.</p>
<p>It is important to distinguish between the post-WWII demographic boom in births vs. the cultural generations born during that era. Generations are a function of the common formative experiences of its members, not the fertility rates of its parents. And most analysts now see generations as getting shorter (usually 10-15 years now), partly because of the acceleration of culture. Many experts now believe it breaks down more or less this way:</p>
<p>DEMOGRAPHIC boom in babies:    1946-1964<br />
Baby Boom GENERATION:            1942-1953<br />
Generation Jones:                               1954-1965<br />
Generation X:                                     1966-1978<br />
Generation Y/Millennials:                  1979-1993</p>
<p>Here are some good links about GenJones I found:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20090127/column27_st.art.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20090127/column27_st.art.htm</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ta_Du5K0jk" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ta_Du5K0jk</a></p>
<p><a href="http://generationjones.com/2009latest.html" rel="nofollow">http://generationjones.com/2009latest.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

