<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CornellWatch &#187; pubic hair</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kitschmag.com/watch/tag/pubic-hair/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kitschmag.com/watch</link>
	<description>news, politics, pop culture, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 20:58:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Stalking Sundays: Follicle Follies! (A Play in Three Acts)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kitschmag.com/watch/2009/03/01/stalking-sundays-follicle-follies-a-play-in-three-acts/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kitschmag.com/watch/2009/03/01/stalking-sundays-follicle-follies-a-play-in-three-acts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 05:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>D. Evan Mulvihill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stalking sundays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stuff to do if ur bored]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craigslist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ithaca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pubic hair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kitschmag.com/watch/2009/03/01/stalking-sundays-follicle-follies-a-play-in-three-acts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week, we bring you not one but three (3!) rousing posts contemplating the nature of, shall we say, the presence (or lack thereof!) of follicles in the crotchal region. The first is a spectacularly reasoned entreaty by a concerned woman who just wants men to shave some &#8212; BUT NOT ALL! &#8212; of their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.kitschmag.com/watch/files/2009/03/three-people-talking.jpg" title="A conjecture of what our three speakers might look like in the flesh."><img src="http://blogs.kitschmag.com/watch/files/2009/03/three-people-talking.jpg" alt="A conjecture of what our three speakers might look like in the flesh." align="left" height="197" width="297" /></a>This week, we bring you not one but three (3!) rousing posts contemplating the nature of, shall we say, the presence (or lack thereof!) of follicles in the crotchal region. The first is a spectacularly reasoned entreaty by a concerned woman who just wants men to shave some &#8212; BUT NOT ALL! &#8212; of their junk hair. LOL. The second begins the descent into madness/irrelevance, as we hear what I presume to be a man bewailing the sorry state of female Craigslist picture-posters. Happily, it ends on a positive note: &#8220;I saw a girl once who had an arrow shaved, pointing to the sweet spot&#8230;.&#8221; The final post begins ominously, bearing the mark of the devil: an improperly used semicolon! It ends with what can only be properly described as full-blown Satanism: the terrible, awful, wretched mangling of a perfectly holy adage! Read on to discover the follies.</p>
<p><strong>ACT I: A MODEST PROPOSAL </strong></p>
<h2><a href="http://ithaca.craigslist.org/rnr/1056161722.html">Pubic hair (barenakedlady)</a></h2>
<p><span id="more-247"></span></p>
<hr /> Reply to: <a href="mailto:pers-1056161722@craigslist.org?subject=Pubic%20hair%20%28barenakedlady%29">pers-1056161722@craigslist.org</a> <sup>[<a href="http://www.craigslist.org/about/help/replying_to_posts">Errors when replying to ads?</a>]</sup><br />
Date: 2009-03-01,  8:51PM ESTI am a girl, and I myself prefer that it is either very well trimmed or the landing strip. I have to agree that I think women look like little girl without a little bit down there.I also think that for men, they should definately not shave it all off. A little hair is fine, or even a little bit more as long as it is well maintained. LOL. Otherwise you like a little boy who hasn&#8217;t hit puberty yet. Some men believe it adds a couple of inches to their penis. I would definitely have to disagree with that.<strong>ACT II: THE FOLLY BEGINS</strong></p>
<h2><a href="http://ithaca.craigslist.org/rnr/1056176984.html">Pubic hair (there)</a></h2>
<hr /> Reply to: <a href="mailto:pers-1056176984@craigslist.org?subject=Pubic%20hair%20%28there%29">pers-1056176984@craigslist.org</a> <sup>[<a href="http://www.craigslist.org/about/help/replying_to_posts">Errors when replying to ads?</a>]</sup><br />
Date: 2009-03-01,  9:04PM ESTall these posts without good pictures are worthless&#8230; I disagree with the men shaving thing, it certainly makes mine look longer without the hair there and no stragglers in her teeth, she likes that&#8230; I saw a girl once who had an arrow shaved, pointing to the sweet spot&#8230;.<br />
<strong>ACT III: DESCENT INTO MADNESS</strong></p>
<h2><a href="http://ithaca.craigslist.org/rnr/1056186120.html">re;Pubic hair </a></h2>
<hr /> Reply to: <a href="mailto:pers-1056186120@craigslist.org?subject=re%3bPubic%20hair%20">pers-1056186120@craigslist.org</a> <sup>[<a href="http://www.craigslist.org/about/help/replying_to_posts">Errors when replying to ads?</a>]</sup><br />
Date: 2009-03-01,  9:12PM EST<br />
my husband doesn&#8217;t care how I have my hair, but I prefer it waxed<br />
and<br />
I prefer him waxed too</p>
<p>each to their own<em>And scene.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kitschmag.com/watch/2009/03/01/stalking-sundays-follicle-follies-a-play-in-three-acts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

